Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1211210

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory"

From Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory"
Date 2015-08-21 17:10 +0200
Message-ID <pZW78-7dY-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pWRQl-8uz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWRQl-8uz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXuRI-5Qe-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXvb3-6cV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXFDr-5g2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[ Adding David Woodhouse ]

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 02:52:15PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The idea is that this memory is not meant to be available to the page
>> allocator and should not count as new memory capacity.  We're only
>> hotplugging it to get struct page coverage.
>
> This might need a bigger audit of the max_pfn usages.  I remember
> architectures using it as a decisions for using IOMMUs or similar.

We chatted about this at LPC yesterday.  The takeaway was that the
max_pfn checks that the IOMMU code does is for checking whether a
device needs an io-virtual mapping to reach addresses above its DMA
limit (if it can't do 64-bit DMA).  Given the capacities of persistent
memory it's likely that a device with this limitation already can't
address all of RAM let alone PMEM.   So it seems to me that updating
max_pfn for PMEM hotplug does not buy us anything except a few more
opportunities to confuse PMEM as typical RAM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory" Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-21 17:10 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory" Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:20 +0200

csiph-web