Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: add __must_check annotation for dmaengine_pause()

From	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: add __must_check annotation for dmaengine_pause()
Date	2015-08-21 10:40 +0200
Message-ID	<pZQ1J-6KY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pUW7L-1ta-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUW7M-1ta-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWevF-1vq-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWeFj-1Wr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWh0t-5br-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 02:34:29PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 12:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I think what people need to learn is that an API in the kernel which
> > returns an int _can_ fail - it returns an int so it _can_ return an
> > error code.  If it _can_ return an error code, there _will_ be
> > implementations which _do_.
> > 
> > If you don't check the return code, either your code doesn't care whether
> > the function was successful or not, or you're playing with fire.  This is
> > a prime example of playing with fire.
> > 
> > Let's leave the crappy userspace laziness with regard to error checking
> > to userspace, and keep it out of the kernel.
> > 
> > Yes, the DMA engine capabilities may not be sufficient to describe every
> > detail of DMA engines, but that's absolutely no reason to skimp on error
> > checking.  Had there been some kind of error checking at the site, this
> > problem would have been spotted before the 8250-omap driver was merged.
> 
> Let me disable RX-DMA in 8250-omap code and push that stable. Then we
> won't need a special annotation for pause support because it remains
> off and is currently about one user. I browsed each driver in
> drivers/dma each one which does support pause supports it and all of
> them implement it unconditionally (ipu_idmac grabs a mutex first but
> this is another story).
> Adding error checking to 8250-omap like I have it in #1 and disabling
> RX-DMA in case pause fails looks be reasonable since there is nothing
> else that can be done I guess.
> Once we have the missing piece in omap-dma the RX-DMA can be enabled in
> 8250-omap.
> Does this sound like a plan we can agree on?

Yes sounds good to me..

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: add __must_check annotation for  dmaengine_pause() Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-08-21 10:40 +0200

csiph-web