Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1210953
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Persistent Reservation API V2 |
| Date | 2015-08-21 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pZOCC-4RE-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pWxHY-4Bz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZHUt-3qg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:56:36PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote: > NVMe can also specify > if whether or not a reservation should persist through power-loss. SCSI does as well, it's the APTPL flag. However reservations not persistent through a power loss are basically useless, so I decided to force them on in the API. From the documentation: "All implementations are expected to ensure the reservations survive a power loss" So I would prefer not to add it, or if we really have to as a negative flag to specifically opt out of the APTPL behavior. > with it. For example, NVMe can ignore existing keys when acquiring a > reservation in addition to registering a new key. This sounds like a sensible addition to me, and I wouldn't be surprised if future SPC versions will add this flag. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Persistent Reservation API V2 Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> - 2015-08-21 02:00 +0200 Re: Persistent Reservation API V2 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-08-21 09:10 +0200
csiph-web