Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1208535
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make them NMI-safe |
| Date | 2015-08-17 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pYqCm-5HD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pQ0F3-42m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQ0F4-42m-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote: > This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries > that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown. > > The Xen code here has a confusing comment. > > The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with IRQs on. > Add a check under CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY to detect that. > > +/* > + * Enters the IRQ stack if we're not already using it. NMI-safe. Clobbers > + * flags and puts old RSP into old_rsp, and leaves all other GPRs alone. > + * Requires kernel GSBASE. > + * > + * The invariant is that, if irq_count != 1, then the IRQ stack is in use. > + */ I might be wrong, but shouldn't be this read as 'if irq_count != -1' ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make them NMI-safe Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 13:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make them NMI-safe Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-19 18:00 +0200
csiph-web