Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1208465
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 00/26] Re-use nvram module |
| Date | 2015-08-17 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pYnXR-1P5-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pQ2xb-6Hb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pY2gF-49R-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYnEt-1sk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Finn,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
>> BTW, checkpatch reported a few newly-introduced whitespace errors in
>> patches 03, 05, 16, 24, and 25.
>
> I will check again, but I'm sure those are all deliberate. I examined all
> the "errors" and "warnings" before submitting.
>
> checkpatch doesn't really understand the difference between whitespace
> used for indentation of statements (according to scope) and whitespace
> used for alignment of terms or parameters (when line-wrapped). Any tool
> that fails to make that distinction can't be depended upon to correctly
> validate the elisp in Documentation/CodingStyle, for example.
Checkpatch complains because you don't replace a sequence of 8 spaces
by a TAB in continuation lines.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v5 00/26] Re-use nvram module Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/26] Re-use nvram module Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-08-17 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/26] Re-use nvram module Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-08-17 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/26] Re-use nvram module Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-08-17 10:50 +0200
csiph-web