Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1207434

Re: [PATCH v10 19/20] x86/asm/efi: Create a stack frame in efi_call()

From Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v10 19/20] x86/asm/efi: Create a stack frame in efi_call()
Date 2015-08-14 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <pXjjA-6cs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pXdHb-6tK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXdHc-6tK-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 13 Aug, at 10:10:40PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> efi_call() is a callable non-leaf function which doesn't honor
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, which can result in bad stack traces.
> 
> Create a stack frame for it when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
> index 86d0f9e..0df2dcc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
>  #include <asm/page_types.h>
> +#include <asm/frame.h>
>  
>  #define SAVE_XMM			\
>  	mov %rsp, %rax;			\
> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@
>  	.endm
>  
>  ENTRY(efi_call)
> +	FRAME_BEGIN
>  	SAVE_XMM
>  	mov (%rsp), %rax
>  	mov 8(%rax), %rax
> @@ -88,6 +90,7 @@ ENTRY(efi_call)
>  	RESTORE_PGT
>  	addq $48, %rsp
>  	RESTORE_XMM
> +	FRAME_END
>  	ret
>  ENDPROC(efi_call)

You mention that stackvalidate will recursively validate the frame
pointers in all code paths. Since we're calling into firmware code from
efi_call(), we don't need to do anything special here right?

I'm guessing stackvalidate would just stop since it has no way of
knowing the target address of the %call instruction, but I just wanted
to check (especially since the firmware ABI is different).

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v10 19/20] x86/asm/efi: Create a stack frame in efi_call() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2015-08-14 05:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v10 19/20] x86/asm/efi: Create a stack frame in efi_call() Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 11:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v10 19/20] x86/asm/efi: Create a stack frame in efi_call() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2015-08-14 16:10 +0200

csiph-web