Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1208124
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction |
| Date | 2015-08-15 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pXMYj-7jF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pXvNM-7b2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2015-08-15 0:38 GMT+02:00 Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>: > Would you all consider it acceptable to disallow watchpoints on per > cpu data entirely? I can think of a *lot* of places where hitting #DB > when accessing per cpu data from entry asm would be bad. > > Of course, actually implementing that might be less than entirely fun, > given that a cpu could be onlined after creating a watchpoint. Well I think there will always be places where setting a breakpoint is a bad idea. The same goes for kprobes. We can't fix all of them. Kernel breakpoints can only be set by root users so it's not a security issue. Besides, kernel breakpoints should only be used by kernel hackers (perf, kdb). Given the wide use of per-cpu data, forbidding all of them will seriously reduce the usability of kernel breakpoints. Not that I think they are really used in practice though ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-15 00:40 +0200 Re: More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:00 +0200
csiph-web