Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1208124

Re: More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction

From Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction
Date 2015-08-15 19:00 +0200
Message-ID <pXMYj-7jF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pXvNM-7b2-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


2015-08-15 0:38 GMT+02:00 Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>:
> Would you all consider it acceptable to disallow watchpoints on per
> cpu data entirely?  I can think of a *lot* of places where hitting #DB
> when accessing per cpu data from entry asm would be bad.
>
> Of course, actually implementing that might be less than entirely fun,
> given that a cpu could be onlined after creating a watchpoint.

Well I think there will always be places where setting a breakpoint is
a bad idea. The same goes for kprobes. We can't fix all of them.
Kernel breakpoints can only be set by root users so it's not a
security issue. Besides, kernel breakpoints should only be used by
kernel hackers (perf, kdb).

Given the wide use of per-cpu data, forbidding all of them will
seriously reduce the usability of kernel breakpoints. Not that I think
they are really used in practice though ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-15 00:40 +0200
  Re: More hw_breakpoint scariness reduction Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:00 +0200

csiph-web