Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1208109
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation |
| Date | 2015-08-15 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pXLSy-5ML-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pX41c-Hx-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX8et-6ZO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXquK-7Tq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXquK-7Tq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXFN7-5ru-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:58:16AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> > I'll merge with your code for v3. >> >> Sounds, let me go rebase the __pfn_t patches on -mm so we'all lined up >> and collision free. > > I'm doubt that we'll have PFN mapping ready for 4.3. I'd rather see > Ross series goes first, and move the patch to remove the size argument > from ->direct access [1] over to this series as well. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/commit/?h=pfn&id=8e15e69fb9e61ac563c5a7ffd9dd9a7b545cced3 Yes, let's do it. The need for DAX persistence guarantees is a higher priority than solving the DAX vs PMEM unbind bug. Especially if we can defer __pfn_t and get some basic struct page mapping into 4.3 as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-13 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-13 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-08-15 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-15 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-08-15 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-15 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-08-15 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-15 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 22:10 +0200
csiph-web