Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1207076

Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cl

From "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cl
Date 2015-08-13 21:10 +0200
Message-ID <pX630-3Qo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pX5qh-2R4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> On x86, the case that msword >= divsor causes a divide exception
>> (divide ba generalization of divide by zero), so it's tempting
>> to do the same sort of "assume no trap and fix up in the handler"
>> trick as <asm/uaccess.h>.

> That would be horrible. One of the reasonably common cases of do_div()
> is for printing out numbers. And they are often in the 4G+ range..

Actually, printing numbers is *not* such an instance; I've had my fingers
in lib/vsprintf.c, and since the divisor is constant, it uses reciprocal
multiplies.

The only instance of do_div in lib/vsprintf.c is in a version of put_dec()
which is used only if BITS_PER_LONG == 64.  If bits_per_long == 32,
it uses a neat hack due to Douglas Jones which avoids using divide
instructions entirely!

(Commit 133fd9f5cd if you are curious.)


The hot paths with 64-bit results are in the block layer and RAID
code, and that's why I wasn't seriously suggesting replacing *all*
instances; it was more of a static code size diet hack.

(It's also not likely worth the maintenance burden of the additional
code subtlety.  "Tempting" is not necessarily a good idea.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cl "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2015-08-13 08:20 +0200
  Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM  corruption 'Structure needs cl Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-13 18:30 +0200
    Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cl "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2015-08-13 20:20 +0200
      Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM  corruption 'Structure needs cl Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0200
        Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cl "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2015-08-13 21:10 +0200

csiph-web