Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1207012

Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator
Date 2015-08-13 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <pX4DV-1Gi-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pJFN0-Ef-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pJFN2-Ef-73@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:08PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Energy-aware scheduling is only meant to be active while the system is
> _not_ over-utilized. That is, there are spare cycles available to shift
> tasks around based on their actual utilization to get a more
> energy-efficient task distribution without depriving any tasks. When
> above the tipping point task placement is done the traditional way,
> spreading the tasks across as many cpus as possible based on priority
> scaled load to preserve smp_nice.
> 
> The over-utilization condition is conservatively chosen to indicate
> over-utilization as soon as one cpu is fully utilized at it's highest
> frequency. We don't consider groups as lumping usage and capacity
> together for a group of cpus may hide the fact that one or more cpus in
> the group are over-utilized while group-siblings are partially idle. The
> tasks could be served better if moved to another group with completely
> idle cpus. This is particularly problematic if some cpus have a
> significantly reduced capacity due to RT/IRQ pressure or if the system
> has cpus of different capacity (e.g. ARM big.LITTLE).

I might be tired, but I'm having a very hard time deciphering this
second paragraph.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point  indicator Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-13 19:40 +0200
  Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point  indicator Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-08-14 15:00 +0200

csiph-web