Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1207012
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator |
| Date | 2015-08-13 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pX4DV-1Gi-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pJFN0-Ef-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pJFN2-Ef-73@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:08PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Energy-aware scheduling is only meant to be active while the system is > _not_ over-utilized. That is, there are spare cycles available to shift > tasks around based on their actual utilization to get a more > energy-efficient task distribution without depriving any tasks. When > above the tipping point task placement is done the traditional way, > spreading the tasks across as many cpus as possible based on priority > scaled load to preserve smp_nice. > > The over-utilization condition is conservatively chosen to indicate > over-utilization as soon as one cpu is fully utilized at it's highest > frequency. We don't consider groups as lumping usage and capacity > together for a group of cpus may hide the fact that one or more cpus in > the group are over-utilized while group-siblings are partially idle. The > tasks could be served better if moved to another group with completely > idle cpus. This is particularly problematic if some cpus have a > significantly reduced capacity due to RT/IRQ pressure or if the system > has cpus of different capacity (e.g. ARM big.LITTLE). I might be tired, but I'm having a very hard time deciphering this second paragraph. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-13 19:40 +0200 Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 25/46] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-08-14 15:00 +0200
csiph-web