Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1206862

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the pinctrl device

From Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the pinctrl device
Date 2015-08-13 16:40 +0200
Message-ID <pX1PH-652-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pM3UR-8kr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
> 
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
> 
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
>   gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
>   pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
>   ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property

Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.

Thierry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the  pinctrl device Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:40 +0200

csiph-web