Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1206734
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] gpio: brcmstb: Add interrupt and wakeup source support |
| Date | 2015-08-13 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWYIa-1FS-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pStCV-6lv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pStCW-6lv-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> wrote:
> Uses the gpiolib irqchip helpers. For this to work, the irq setup
> function is called once per bank instead of once per device. Note
> that all known uses of this block have a BCM7120 L2 interrupt
> controller as a parent. Supports interrupts for all GPIOs.
>
> In the IRQ handler, we check for raised IRQs for invalid GPIOs and
> warn (ratelimited) if they're encountered.
>
> Also, several drivers (e.g. gpio-keys) allow for GPIOs to be
> configured as wakeup sources, and this GPIO controller supports that
> through a separate interrupt path.
>
> The de-facto standard DT property "wakeup-source" is checked, since
> that indicates whether the GPIO controller hardware can wake. Uses
> the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND irq_chip flag because UPG GIO doesn't have
> any of its own wakeup source configuration.
>
> Aside regarding gpiolib irqchip helpers: It wasn't obvious (to me)
> that you can have multiple chained irqchips and associated IRQ domains
> for a single parent IRQ, and as long as the xlate function is written
> correctly, a GPIO IRQ request end up checking the correct domain and
> will get associated with the correct IRQ. What helps make this clear
> is to read
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
> - of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate()
> - of_get_named_gpiod_flags()
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:
> - gpiochip_find()
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - when checking parent_irq, use <= 0 or > 0 since 0 is NO_IRQ.
Patch applied, but:
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) {
> + priv->parent_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (priv->parent_irq <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get IRQ");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> + } else {
> + priv->parent_irq = -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> if (brcmstb_gpio_sanity_check_banks(dev, np, res))
> return -EINVAL;
This patch does not apply cleanly because the version in my
tree has INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->bank_list);
before the sanity check.
I applied it manually, but check that things are working right.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] gpio: brcmstb: Add interrupt and wakeup source support Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-08-13 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] gpio: brcmstb: Add interrupt and wakeup source support Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] gpio: brcmstb: Add interrupt and wakeup source support Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-08-14 14:40 +0200
csiph-web