Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1206395
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' |
| Date | 2015-08-13 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWMQG-15t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <pWxHY-4Bz-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWxHY-4Bz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWGrV-hj-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWMH1-TY-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWMQG-15t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> Does your objection still apply if we supplied our own implementations of a >> handful of libgcc helpers? > > We already do that. > > Several architectures actually implement _udivdi3. > > However, do_div() is actually the much simpler/better interface. > > I don't think we have a single case in the kernel where we really want > the full 64/64 division, and the 64/32->64 case really is > fundamentally simpler. > > This whole "do_div is so complicated" thing is just BS. > > The thing that triggered Christoph to ask was a bug in the > implementation of that *simpler* interface. What makes you think that > making people implement _udivdi3 would magically avoid all such bugs? > Nothing. We could ask gcc to fix this, I suppose (add __udiv_64_over_32 or whatever). --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-08-12 08:30 +0200
Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-12 17:50 +0200
Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-08-13 00:30 +0200
Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-13 00:40 +0200
Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-13 00:40 +0200
Re: enabling libgcc for 64-bit divisions, was Re: PROBLEM: XFS on ARM corruption 'Structure needs cleaning' Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-13 05:30 +0200
csiph-web