Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1204545
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lkp] [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops |
| Date | 2015-08-10 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pW2b8-uF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pSxnb-3pa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU2oV-4nL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/asm
>> commit b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9 ("x86/build: Fix detection of GCC -mpreferred-stack-boundary support")
>
> Does the performance regression go away reproducibly if you do:
>
> git revert b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
>
> ?
FWIW, I spot-checked the generated code. All I saw were the deletion
of some dummy subtraction from rsp to align the stack for children,
changes of stack frame offsets, and a couple instances in which
instructions got reordered.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [lkp] [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-05 10:40 +0200 Re: [lkp] [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-10 22:50 +0200
csiph-web