Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201650
| From | Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning |
| Date | 2015-08-06 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUrdF-77S-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pU9qq-6iF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUpYd-5ay-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/08/15 10:43, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:02:08PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call regulator_set_voltage() >> on a load switches that are modelled as regulators with a parent supply as >> there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. >> To avoid this warning, use the unlocked version of the get_voltage(). > > No, just completely removing the locking is broken - the locking is > there for a reason! This needs some lockdep dance, either something Yes, I totally agree, removing locking would have more regressions. > like what we have for regmaps with a class per regulator or something lock_class per regulator makes more sense, I will try to cookup an RFC patch. > more fancy but whatever's going on just hacking out locking to shut up > warnings from lockdep is clearly not a good idea. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-08-05 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 03:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-08-06 09:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 09:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-06 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-08-06 13:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-08-06 13:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-07 16:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-06 13:50 +0200
csiph-web