Groups > linux.kernel > #1201622

Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table

From	Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table
Date	2015-08-06 12:20 +0200
Message-ID	<pUqrf-5XV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pU2Ii-4Ky-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU2RY-5aV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUaZc-8nv-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 02:06 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> [ please cc netdev ]
>>
>> On 08/05/2015 10:56 AM, Zang MingJie wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> I found a bug when remove an ip address which is referenced by a routing
>>> entry.
>>>
>>> step to reproduce:
>>>
>>> ip li add type dummy
>>> ip li set dummy0 up
>>> ip ad add 10.0.0.1/24 dev dummy0
>>> ip ad add 10.0.0.2/24 dev dummy0
>
>
> Okay, so up to this point you have 2 addresses on the same subnet that are
> now on dummy0.
>
>>> ip ro add default via 10.0.0.2/24
>
>
> This makes the default route go through 10.0.0.2.
>
>>> ip ad del 10.0.0.2/24 dev dummy0
>
>
> Then you remove 10.0.0.2 from the local system, however since 10.0.0.1 is on
> the same subnet dummy0 would still be the correct interface to access
> 10.0.0.2 it is just no longer local to the system.
>
>>> after deleting the secondary ip address, the routing entry still
>>> pointing to 10.0.0.2
>
>
> You didn't delete the default routing entry so why would you expect it to
> change?  All you did is remove 10.0.0.2 from the local system.  I believe
> the assumption is that 10.0.0.2 is still out there somewhere, it just isn't
> on the local system anymore.

Yes, 10.0.0.2 is migrated to somewhere else

>
>>> # ip ro
>>> default via 10.0.0.2 dev dummy0
>>> 10.0.0.0/24 dev dummy0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.0.0.1
>
>
> This matches up with what I would expect.  10.0.0.2 is the default gateway
> and it is accessible from dummy0 since 10.0.0.0/24 is accessible from
> dummy0.

This means 0.0.0.0/0 is accessible via 10.0.0.2 on the network of dummy0

>
>>> but actually, kernel considers the default route is directly connected.
>>>
>>> # ip ro get 1.1.1.1
>>> 1.1.1.1 dev dummy0  src 10.0.0.1
>>>      cache
>
>
> I'm not sure how you came to the "directly connected" conclusion. It is
> still routing things out through 10.0.0.2 from 10.0.0.1.
>
> Maybe your example would work better if you used 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.1.1
> instead.  Then I think you might be able to better see that when you delete
> the second address the route would be broken.

No, it isn't. when ping 1.1.1.1, kernel will directly send arp request
braodcast to 1.1.1.1, this is not what I expect. it should send arp
request to 10.0.0.2, following should be the correct routing entry:

# ip ro get 1.1.1.1
1.1.1.1 via 10.0.0.2 dev dummy0  src 10.0.0.1
    cache


>
> - Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:00 +0200
  Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 19:50 +0200
      Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:20 +0200
        Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 00:40 +0200
          Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 10:30 +0200
            Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 18:10 +0200
              Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-08-07 19:10 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 12:40 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-08-10 11:20 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:00 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-08-10 14:00 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:00 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-08-11 23:20 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 10:20 +0200
                Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2015-08-12 17:30 +0200

csiph-web