Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201445
| From | Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations |
| Date | 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUmdY-86Q-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <pTmg2-1ME-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pTuwW-5lZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUjzr-3Vy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUjzr-3Vy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUmdY-86Q-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 12:20 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 18:11 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 19:32 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Scott Wood > > > <scottwood@freescale.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you explain irq_mask()? Why would there still be IRQs > > > > > destined > > > > > > for > > > > > > this CPU at this point? > > > > > > > > > > This function just masks irq by setting the registers in RCPM > > > (for > > > > > example, RCPM_CPMIMR, RCPM_CPMCIMR). Actually, all irqs to > > > this CPU > > > > > have been migrated to other CPUs. > > > > > > > > So why do we need to set those bits in RCPM? Is it just caution? > > > > > > Setting these bits can mask interrupts signalled to RCPM from MPIC > > > as a > > > means of > > > waking up from a lower power state. So, cores will not be waked up > > > unexpectedly. > > > > Why would the MPIC be signalling those interrupts if they've been > > masked at > > the MPIC? > > > > -Scott > > > > The interrupts to RCPM from MPIC are IRQ, Machine Check, NMI and > Critical interrupts. Some of them didn't be masked in MPIC. What interrupt could actually happen to a sleeping cpu that this protects against? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> - 2015-08-06 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> - 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> - 2015-08-06 20:10 +0200
csiph-web