Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201424
| From | "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [llvm-dev] [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event |
| Date | 2015-08-06 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUl8d-6gt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <pTWjx-41F-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU0Qa-22l-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU19w-2FR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU2oV-4nL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUk2t-4Ik-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2015/8/6 11:22, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:28:13PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> It doesn't work for me at first since in my llvm there's only
>> llvm.bpf.load.*.
>>
>> I think llvm.bpf.store.* belone to some patches you haven't posted yet?
> nope. only loads have special instructions ld_abs/ld_ind
> which are represented by these intrinsics.
> stores, so far, are done via single bpf_store_bytes() helper function.
>
>>> the typeid changing ids with order is surprising.
>>> I think the assertion in ExtractTypeInfo() is not hard.
>>> Just there were no such use cases. May be we can do something
>>> similar to what LowerIntrinsicCall() does and lower it differently
>>> in the backend.
>>>
>> But in backend can we still get type information? I thought type is
>> meaningful in frontend only, and backend behaviors is unable to affect
>> DWARF generation, right?
> why do we need to affect type generation? we just need to know dwarf
> type id in the backend, so we can emit it as a constant.
> I still think lowering eh_typeid_for differently may work.
> Like instead of doing
> GV = ExtractTypeInfo(I.getArgOperand(0)) followed by
> getMachineFunction().getMMI().getTypeIDFor(GV)
> we can get dwarf type id from I.getArgOperand(0) if it's
> any pointer to struct type.
I have a bad news to tell:
#include <stdio.h>
struct my_str {
int x;
int y;
} __gv_my_str;
struct my_str __gv_my_str_;
struct my_str2 {
int x;
int y;
} __gv_my_str2;
int typeid(void *p) asm("llvm.eh.typeid.for");
int main()
{
printf("%d\n", typeid(&__gv_my_str));
printf("%d\n", typeid(&__gv_my_str_));
printf("%d\n", typeid(&__gv_my_str2));
return 0;
}
Compiled with clang into x86 executable, then:
$ ./a.out
3
2
1
See? I have two types but reported 3 IDs.
And here is the implementation of getTypeIDFor, in
lib/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.cpp:
unsigned MachineModuleInfo::getTypeIDFor(const GlobalValue *TI) {
for (unsigned i = 0, N = TypeInfos.size(); i != N; ++i)
if (TypeInfos[i] == TI) return i + 1;
TypeInfos.push_back(TI);
return TypeInfos.size();
}
It only checks value in a stupid way.
Now the dwarf side becomes clear (see my other response), but the
frontend may require
totally reconsidering.
Do you know someone in LLVM-dev who can help us?
Thank you.
> I'm not familiar with dwarf handling part of llvm, but feels possible.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-05 04:00 +0200
Re: Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-05 04:10 +0200
Re: [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-05 09:00 +0200
Re: [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-08-05 09:20 +0200
Re: [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-05 10:40 +0200
Re: [llvm-dev] [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 05:30 +0200
Re: [llvm-dev] [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-06 06:40 +0200
Re: [llvm-dev] [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:00 +0200
csiph-web