Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201099
| From | Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints |
| Date | 2015-08-05 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUdkm-3qW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pSw7L-1pB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pSw7L-1pB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:58:13PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Currently the driver prints "*not supported" if any of the features
> queried are in fact not supported, let us print the available
> features instead.
>
> This patch removes all instances pr_info printing "*not supported",
> and add a new function called "print_supported_features", which will
> print the available laptop features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index d983dc4..66b596a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void toshiba_illumination_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> pr_err("ACPI call to query Illumination support failed\n");
> else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> - pr_info("Illumination device not available\n");
> + return;
> else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS)
> dev->illumination_supported = 1;
> }
> @@ -483,7 +483,6 @@ static void toshiba_illumination_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
> pr_err("ACPI call for illumination failed\n");
> return;
> } else if (result == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> - pr_info("Illumination not supported\n");
> return;
> }
I mentioned this in the previous review. For several of these, we have an if
statement that checks for a condition, and then returns, which is exactly what
would happen if we didn't have the if statement at all.
If the context is important, a comment should be sufficient. Is there a
compelling reason to add the redundant check?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2015-08-05 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2015-08-06 00:30 +0200
csiph-web