Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1202270

Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool()

From Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool()
Date 2015-08-07 05:40 +0200
Message-ID <pUGFH-45g-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <pU7eY-2WR-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUdaG-3fe-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUf2Q-5Ys-63@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUf2Q-5Ys-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUBmF-4No-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:50:23PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:06:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:00:26 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > >
> > > > If there's some reason why this can't happen, can we please have a code
> > > > comment which reveals that reason?
> > > 
> > > zpool_create_pool() should work if this returns true, unless as you
> > > say the module is rmmod'ed *and* removed from the system - since
> > > zpool_create_pool() will call request_module() just as this function
> > > does.  I can add a comment explaining that.
> > 
> > I like comments ;)
> > 
> > Seth, I'm planning on sitting on these patches until you've had a
> > chance to review them.
> 
> Thanks Andrew.  I'm reviewing now.  Patch 2/3 is pretty huge.  I've got
> the gist of the changes now.  I'm also building and testing for myself
> as this creates a lot more surface area for issues, alternating between
> compressors and allocating new compression transforms on the fly.
> 
> I'm kinda with Sergey on this in that it adds yet another complexity to
> an already complex feature.  This adds more locking, more RCU, more
> refcounting.  It's becoming harder to review, test, and verify.
> 
> I should have results tomorrow.

So I gave it a test run turning all the knobs (compressor, enabled,
max_pool_percent, and zpool) like a crazy person and it was stable,
and all the adjustments had the expected result.

Dan, you might follow up with an update to Documentation/vm/zswap.txt
noting that these parameters are runtime adjustable now.

The growing complexity is a concern, but it is nice to have the
flexibility.  Thanks for the good work!

To patchset:

Acked-by: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>

> 
> Thanks,
> Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> - 2015-08-05 15:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-05 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-06 00:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-08-07 00:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-08-07 05:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> - 2015-08-14 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] zpool: add zpool_has_pool() Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> - 2015-08-06 00:10 +0200
      [PATCH] zpool: clarification comment for zpool_has_pool Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> - 2015-08-06 20:00 +0200

csiph-web