Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1199545

[tip:perf/core] perf/x86/hw_breakpoints: Improve range breakpoint validation

From tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@zytor.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/hw_breakpoints: Improve range breakpoint validation
Date 2015-08-04 11:00 +0200
Message-ID <pTGeK-5Af-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pS9kR-1Uh-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Commit-ID:  ab513927ab449af00cc70b0269e15ee80dd537f9
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/ab513927ab449af00cc70b0269e15ee80dd537f9
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:32:41 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:16:54 +0200

perf/x86/hw_breakpoints: Improve range breakpoint validation

Range breakpoints will do the wrong thing if the address isn't
aligned.  While we're there, add comments about why it's safe for
instruction breakpoints.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ae25d14d61f2f43b78e0a247e469f3072df7e201.1438312874.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 78f3e90..6f345d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -291,8 +291,18 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
 		break;
 #endif
 	default:
+		/* AMD range breakpoint */
 		if (!is_power_of_2(bp->attr.bp_len))
 			return -EINVAL;
+		if (bp->attr.bp_addr & (bp->attr.bp_len - 1))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		/*
+		 * It's impossible to use a range breakpoint to fake out
+		 * user vs kernel detection because bp_len - 1 can't
+		 * have the high bit set.  If we ever allow range instruction
+		 * breakpoints, then we'll have to check for kprobe-blacklisted
+		 * addresses anywhere in the range.
+		 */
 		if (!cpu_has_bpext)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		info->mask = bp->attr.bp_len - 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/3] x86/perf/hw_breakpoint: Improve range breakpoint validation Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-07-31 05:40 +0200
  [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/hw_breakpoints:   Improve range breakpoint validation tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-08-04 11:00 +0200

csiph-web