Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1197980

Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable

From Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable
Date 2015-08-01 13:40 +0200
Message-ID <pSDiW-3rx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <pRCIh-5jA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRR4C-Ty-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <pS2CK-Ay-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pS91w-1yb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pSkzF-1wQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 31-07-15, 08:30, Radivoje Jovanovic wrote:
> I just looked over the notifier in the current upstream (my patch was
> made on our production kernel which is 3.14 and has old notifier
> implementation with notifier_device in place) and I see your point.

That's disappointing. You were expected to check if the same problem
exists in mainline.

> I agree with you that this patch is trivial for the current
> implementation since the notifier, as it is currently, will enforce
> cpu_cooling policy change at every CPUFREQ_ADJUST which would cause
> problems in our current implementation. In our implementation there is
> a cpufreq driver that will also change policies during CPUFREQ_ADJUST,
> once the request comes from the underlying FW so there would be a fight
> who gets there first since cpu_cooling will change the policy in
> CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier_chain and the driver would do the same thing.
> It seems to me that better implementation of the cpu_cooling notifer
> would be to keep the flag and change the policy in CPUFREQ_ADJUST only
> when the change was requested by cpu_cooling, and update the current
> state of cpufreq_cooling_device during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY event.
> What do you think?

I think the way cpu-cooling is written today, is an *ugly* hack. We hack
the notifier to change policy->max and no one is notified for it.

That's crap.

I would rather get some help from cpufreq core on that. Which can
provide some APIs to take care of thermal considerations.

Okay, I push that to my todo list. Will keep you all posted.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-30 10:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-31 05:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state  variable Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-31 17:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-01 13:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state variable Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-03 05:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpu_cooling: remove local cooling state  variable Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-03 21:40 +0200

csiph-web