Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1194986
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links |
| Date | 2015-07-29 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pRvGP-3OC-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pPvBg-12v-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQQtY-2W3-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQRJo-4Ft-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRoch-1pi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:38:03AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 27, 2015 08:09:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 27-07-15, 15:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Say the subsys add callback runs for a CPU and it doesn't have a policy. > > > If it is offline, we ignore it and the add callback won't be executed > > > for it again. > > > > > > In turn, if it is online, we create a policy for it and we should (right > > > away) link the policy to all of the CPUs that were offline when the subsys add > > > callback was called for them. That's what we do today. > > > > > > Is there anything missing in that? > > > > So the code is working properly after your patch, but I was talking > > on the lines of what Russell suggested. > > > > We should play with the links only when we receive add-dev/remove-dev > > from subsys callbacks. The exception to that will be the offline CPUs > > for which add-dev is called before their policy existed. > > The rule is supposed to be "all of the present CPUs which do not own > a policy should point to one, unless it doesn't exist". The right > approach is then to create links from them to a policy object as soon > as we create one for them. Waiting for something else to happen is just > pointless and this approach covers both the offline and online CPUs, so > I don't think that changing it would improve things really. I'm not sure we disagree with that. It's more about when the symlinks are created, and when you define that a CPU exists. If you're attaching to subsystem in sysfs, then the point that the subsystem interface gets to know about a sysfs node existing is when it's add_dev method is called - it should not assume that a node exists prior to that point, otherwise things are racy. Consider a policy initialisation in parallel with an update of the CPU present map and adding a CPU to sysfs. The CPU present map will be updated first, and then it will be added to sysfs. If you're initialising a cpufreq policy in the middle of that and creating symlinks for all present CPUs, there's a window where the CPU present map indicates that a CPU is present, but there is no sysfs directory for you to create a symlink in. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-07-27 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-07-29 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-29 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-07-29 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-07-29 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-29 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-07-29 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-30 11:10 +0200
csiph-web