Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1194073
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found |
| Date | 2015-07-28 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pRaj0-6q0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pM3UR-8kr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pM3UT-8kr-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote: > When an OF node has a pin range for its GPIOs, return -EPROBE_DEFER if > the pin controller isn't available. > > Otherwise, the GPIO range wouldn't be set at all unless the pin > controller probed always before the GPIO chip. > > With this change, the probe of the GPIO chip will be deferred and will > be retried at a later point, hopefully once the pin controller has been > registered and probed already. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled Sorry for the delay. This looks like the right thing to do, I was just worried that it would have undesired semantic or probe order effects on some platforms, but I think this is one of these cases where I just have to apply this and see what happens when people test it in linux-next. So, patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 12:30 +0200
csiph-web