Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1195738

Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices

From Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices
Date 2015-07-30 09:00 +0200
Message-ID <pRPYS-7zo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <pJbFh-6Su-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRra9-5K8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRzAK-Um-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRMHE-2UQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRPFw-78o-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Sure, I mean, the root reason of this problem is here ( i.e.
>> "stm_core_up" was zero then):
>>      if (!stm_core_up)
>>          return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>
>> Why it was zero?
>> Because the function (i.e. stm_core_init() ) in which "stm_core_up"
>> would be added one hasn't been executed at this moment. It would be
>> executed on module_init stage for you this version of patch.
>
> Again, this is the indented behavior.
>
>> The reason of this warning is:
>> After stm_probe() failed, clk_core_disable() would be called from
>> amba_put_disable_pclk(), then WARN_ON() happened:
>>          if (WARN_ON(core->enable_count == 0))
>>                  return;
>>
>> I'm guessing the reason why "core->enable_count" was 0 at this moment is:
>> I don't know who created a thread to process the
>> amba_pm_runtime_suspend(), in which clk_core_disable() was already
>> called, "core->enable_count" was, of course, cleared to zero then.
>> And this thread run before amba_put_disable_pclk(pcdev) which is just
>> the one called from amba_probe() after
>> "->probe"(i.e. stm_probe in this case) returning a non-zero value.
>
> No, this is guesswork. In amba_probe(), clocks are enabled for the
> drv->probe() and then disabled afterwards and that's where the refcount
> ends up unbalanced, the probe is the culprit.
>
> I can debug your driver for you but you'll at least need to put the code
> up somewhere so I can see it.

The code has already been submitted like I said in the earlier emails,
you may refer [1].

Thanks,
Chunyan

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/4/729

>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-29 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-29 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-29 15:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 05:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-30 07:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 08:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 05:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-30 08:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 09:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System  Trace Module devices Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 09:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-07-30 09:20 +0200

csiph-web