Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1193880
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs |
| Date | 2015-07-28 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pR8Az-3S2-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pQSvL-5Qa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQSvM-5Qa-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR2Ot-3ZZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR7Eu-2w2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR7Oa-2HP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28-07-15, 08:34, Lee Jones wrote: > > I disagree. For one, only 'opp-hz' is defined in ./opp.tx. Secondly > > There are other properties in op.txt like turbo, opp-suspend, latency, > etc.. which can be useful for your platform to. Its not used for now > is a different thing. > > > it would be annoying to have to have to keep jumping between documents > > to obtain the whole picture. Finally, generic bindings are repeated > > in platform/device specific documentation all the time. Grep for > > 'clocks' or 'regulator-* or 'interrupts' or 'reg' or 'clock-frequency' > > Yeah, I agree. I am not against that. What I meant to say was that its > an extension to opp-v2. So whatever is present in opp-v2 can be used > by ST's driver, without mentioning that here as well. > > > (which IMHO I think you should have used instead of 'opp-hz', but > > that's by the by), or any number of other generic properties. > > Hmm, probably yes. See I don't know everything :) > > > > @Rob/Stephen: Please respond before it is late :) > > > > No one knows this stuff better than you. If you can't think of an > > already existing binding that could suit to portray our 'cuts' and > > 'substrate' information (with a similar way to support our "all cuts" > > and "all substrates" options, then there probably isn't one. ;) > > Oh, I wasn't saying that there is an existing binding for supporting > your case. But if we want to move the cuts property to the generic > bindings so that others can use it. :) Okay, so what are we waiting for before you'd be prepared to Ack the binding? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 10:40 +0200
csiph-web