Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1192951

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a deprecated property

From Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a deprecated property
Date 2015-07-27 12:50 +0200
Message-ID <pQO8N-7zV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <pN7tn-5UK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOesO-3Zl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOgkV-6FE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQNPt-7dH-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQNZ7-7ou-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello Mark,

On 07/27/2015 12:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:28:07PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 07/20/2015 12:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
>>> This PMIC uses a single I2C address for all the regulators and these are
>>> controlled by writing to different I2C register addresses. So the regulator
>>> nodes don't have a reg property in this case.
> 
>>> By looking at other regulators bindings, besides the generic regulator.txt
>>> and fixed-regulator.txt DT bindings, there are only 5 (out of 40) that use
>>> the node-name@unit-address convention mentioned in the ePAPR document.
> 
>>> AFAICT all these are for regulators that are actually in different addresses
>>> but I could be wrong so let's see what Mark says.
> 
>> Any opinions on this?
> 
> I just don't care, this is just syntactic noise which has no practical
> meaning as far as I can tell.
>

thanks, I'll then leave the regulator's node name as is in the patch
since that is consistent with the rest of the regulator DT bindings.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a  deprecated property Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-07-27 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a  deprecated property Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-27 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a  deprecated property Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-07-27 12:50 +0200

csiph-web