Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1192929
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive |
| Date | 2015-07-27 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pQNPs-7dH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pKfdL-6cK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPODV-3CT-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPOXg-3Zq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQs8h-1qe-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQNw7-6QN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 27 July 2015 01:08 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> >> Per last discussion on this topic, Arend wanted to discuss abt this with Hante. >>> >> I'm not taking it anyways so feel free to pick it up if you want ! >> > >> > Well, that was before your "timeline" clarification about the generic >> > function. One what tree is this patch based? > Yeah, if this patch depends on another patch I need to know about it. > Otherwise I might break something when I apply this patch. It was latest linux-next at the time, 4.1-rcx perhaps, don't remember exactly. But it certainly doesn't depend on any new code - the patch simply makes use of an existing API vs. using a local hard coded version of same. Give it a spin off your existing tree - shdn't be too difficult to test I presume. -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2015-07-27 12:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-07-27 12:30 +0200
csiph-web