Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1190633

Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, compaction: introduce kcompactd

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:53:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
 
> The slub allocator does try to allocate its high-order memory with 
> __GFP_WAIT before falling back to lower orders if possible.  I would think 
> that this would be the greatest sign of on-demand memory compaction being 
> a problem, especially since CONFIG_SLUB is the default, but I haven't seen 
> such reports.

In fact, some of our product had trouble with slub's high order
allocation 5 months ago. At that time, compaction didn't make high order
page and compaction attempts are frequently deferred. It also causes many
reclaim to make high order page so I suggested masking out __GFP_WAIT
and adding __GFP_NO_KSWAPD when trying slub's high order allocation to
reduce reclaim/compaction overhead. Although using high order page in slub
has some gains that reducing internal fragmentation and reducing management
overhead, benefit is marginal compared to the cost at making high order
page. This solution improves system response time for our case. I planned
to submit the patch but it is delayed due to my laziness. :)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, compaction: introduce kcompactd Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2015-07-23 08:00 +0200

csiph-web