Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190020
| From | Henry Chen <HenryC.Chen@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] regmap: Add function check before called format_val |
| Date | 2015-07-22 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pP3lE-19S-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pOiG6-1tv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOkRA-4NY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOyUx-8gm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOJwC-6vp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 18:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:07:25PM +0800, Henry Chen wrote: > > > Then in driver rtc-mt6397.c, it used regmap_bulk_read() to get the time > > of PMIC, and hit the null function of format_val(), because the > > regmap_bus was null. > > > It skipped the initialization of format_val() because bus == null, but > > called the format_val() at regmap_bulk_read() if bus == null. > > OK, so the issue here is that when we fall back to regmap_read() we may > do so because we have reg_read() and reg_write() functions which in turn > imply no formatting. The expectation here is that val must be an array > of int. The code doesn't completely take that into account though and > the user you're pointing at is assuming it's an array of 16 bit values > which isn't totally unreasonable if it did specify val_bits (we don't > check for that). So, could I call regmap_bulk_read() on rtc-mt6307.c, should I need to change it ? > > > Maybe it was not the good fix for this, but should be a problem need to > > be reported, or should I need to give the regmap_bus on mtk_pmic_wrap.c? > > That file isn't in mainline... oh...it's mtk-pmic-wrap.c, sorry about that. > > memcpy() is definitely not a safe way to move from an unsigned int to a > u16 which is what your specific use case is trying to do. I'll need to > do an audit of existing users (or someone else will!) to figure out what > people are doing with .val_bits in drivers using reg_read() and > reg_write() but I think what we should be doing here is probably > providing appropriate conversion functions based on val_bits on init. Ok, got it, memcpy() should not be used here anymore. Thanks, Henry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] regmap: Add function check before called format_val Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-07-20 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] regmap: Add function check before called format_val Henry Chen <HenryC.Chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-07-21 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] regmap: Add function check before called format_val Henry Chen <HenryC.Chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-07-22 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] regmap: Add function check before called format_val Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-22 19:10 +0200
csiph-web