Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190005
| From | Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice |
| Date | 2015-07-22 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pP3bY-YT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pOkHU-4n9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOkHU-4n9-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOHEv-3Pl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOPLI-76A-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pP2IW-bi-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/22/15 at 09:52am, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:03:57AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Yes, dyn_size can't be zero. But in pcpu_setup_first_chunk(), the local
> > variable dyn_size could be zero caused by below code:
> >
> > if (ai->reserved_size) {
> > schunk->free_size = ai->reserved_size;
> > pcpu_reserved_chunk = schunk;
> > pcpu_reserved_chunk_limit = ai->static_size +
> > ai->reserved_size;
> > } else {
> > schunk->free_size = dyn_size;
> > dyn_size = 0; /* dynamic area covered
> > */
> > }
> >
> > So if no reserved_size dyn_size is assigned to zero, and is checked to
> > see if dchunk need be created in below code:
>
> Hmmm... but then pcpu_reserved_chunk is NULL so there still is no
> duplicate on the list, no?
Yes, you are quite right. I was mistaken. So NACK this patch.
Thanks a lot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-07-22 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> - 2015-07-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-07-22 16:40 +0200
csiph-web