Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1190005

Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice

From Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice
Date 2015-07-22 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <pP3bY-YT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pOkHU-4n9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOkHU-4n9-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOHEv-3Pl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOPLI-76A-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pP2IW-bi-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/22/15 at 09:52am, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:03:57AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Yes, dyn_size can't be zero. But in pcpu_setup_first_chunk(), the local
> > variable dyn_size could be zero caused by below code:
> > 
> > if (ai->reserved_size) {
> >                 schunk->free_size = ai->reserved_size;
> >                 pcpu_reserved_chunk = schunk;
> >                 pcpu_reserved_chunk_limit = ai->static_size +
> > ai->reserved_size;
> >         } else {
> >                 schunk->free_size = dyn_size;
> >                 dyn_size = 0;                   /* dynamic area covered
> > */
> >         }
> > 
> > So if no reserved_size dyn_size is assigned to zero, and is checked to
> > see if dchunk need be created in below code:
> 
> Hmmm... but then pcpu_reserved_chunk is NULL so there still is no
> duplicate on the list, no?

Yes, you are quite right. I was mistaken. So NACK this patch.

Thanks a lot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and  pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-07-22 16:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and  pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> - 2015-07-22 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] perpuc: check pcpu_first_chunk and  pcpu_reserved_chunk to avoid handling them twice Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-07-22 16:40 +0200

csiph-web