Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1189996
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) |
| Date | 2015-07-22 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pP32i-Ny-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <pMXaH-7Oc-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <pNbQm-3OB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pNioO-4NG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOf5w-4IJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOK9j-7tF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 21/07/15 19:05, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/20/2015 01:54 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/07/15 19:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/17/2015 04:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>> determine_rate change shouldn't affect SCPI clock driver but I remember
>>>> seeing round_rate change too on the list which returns value using the
>>>> argument from Boris. Is that planned for v4.3 ? I would need the stable
>>>> branch from this clk_hw_set_rate_range if you decide to push. Let me
>>>> know your preferences. I will post the updated version of the patch
>>>> accordingly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We're not going to change round_rate() so it sounds like you don't need
>>> a stable branch. But you would need this new consumer API. So you still
>>> need a branch right?
>>>
>>
>> I am fine either way. If no one else need the stable branch to be shared
>> with arm-soc, I prefer to use clock consumer API for now to avoid all
>> the troubles to you guys and switch to provider API later. I will post
>> it once the both this driver and that provider API is merged, if that's
>> fine with you ?
>
> Ok. Sounds fine as long as we don't forget.
>
It's ready indeed :), will post it when everything is in place.
Regards,
Sudeep
--->8
From 3ddf7fe5b1286efa712d4f2ba8108ce1855f3e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:19:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clk: scpi: use provider clk_hw_set_rate_range API
instead of
consumer API
SCPI clock provider uses the consumer API clk_set_rate_range to set
min/max rate constraints on the clocks it provides.
Commit c87c640f915a ("clk: Allow providers to configure min/max rates")
added a separate provider API clk_hw_set_rate_range to set the min/max
rate of a clock.
This patch switches away from clk_set_rate_range consumer API to
clk_hw_set_rate_range provider API.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
index 06d0558e8f46..f7c8b7a03cfe 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ scpi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, const struct
of_device_id *match,
clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &sclk->hw);
if (!IS_ERR(clk) && max)
- clk_set_rate_range(clk, min, max);
+ clk_hw_set_rate_range(&sclk->hw, min, max);
return clk;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-07-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-07-16 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-07-17 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-07-22 16:20 +0200
csiph-web