Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1187267
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] zsmalloc: do not take class lock in zs_shrinker_count() |
| Date | 2015-07-18 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pNmC5-2ns-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pNbQm-3OB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Sergey, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:18:18PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > We can avoid taking class ->lock around zs_can_compact() in > zs_shrinker_count(), because the number that we return back > is outdated in general case, by design. We have different > sources that are able to change class's state right after we > return from zs_can_compact() -- ongoing I/O operations, manually > triggered compaction, or two of them happening simultaneously. > > We re-do this calculations during compaction on a per class basis > anyway. > > zs_unregister_shrinker() will not return until we have an > active shrinker, so classes won't unexpectedly disappear > while zs_shrinker_count() iterates them. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> I asked to remove the comment of zs_can_compact about lock. "Should be called under class->lock." Otherwise, Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> > --- > mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c > index 1edd8a0..ed64cf5 100644 > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c > @@ -1836,9 +1836,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, > if (class->index != i) > continue; > > - spin_lock(&class->lock); > pages_to_free += zs_can_compact(class); > - spin_unlock(&class->lock); > } > > return pages_to_free; > -- > 2.4.6 > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] zsmalloc: do not take class lock in zs_shrinker_count() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 13:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH v2] zsmalloc: do not take class lock in zs_shrinker_count() Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2015-07-18 00:50 +0200
csiph-web