Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1186689
| From | Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternative: Provide if/else/endif assembler macros |
| Date | 2015-07-17 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pNbnj-31b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKGQG-6Gh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pMVVg-66m-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16/07/15 19:19, Will Deacon wrote: >> Notes: >> To be honest these if not/else/endif macros are simply more readable >> than the original macro and that might be enough to justify them on >> their own. However below is an example that is needlessly hard to >> write without them because ICC_PMR_EL1 is a C pre-processor macro. >> >> .macro disable_irq, tmp >> mov \tmp, #ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED >> alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF >> msr daifset, #2 >> alternative_else >> msr_s ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp >> alternative_endif >> .endm >> >> The new macros have received a fair degree of testing because I have >> based my (not published since March) pseudo-NMI patch set on them. > > After some consideration, I think I prefer your suggestion over what we > currently have in mainline. However, there are a bunch of patches that > are candidates for 4.3 which will conflict horribly with this. > > Would you be able to: > > (1) Split this up so that you have a patch introducing the new macro, > then a patch converting entry.S and cache.S then a separate one > for kvm/hyp.S? > > (2) Keep alternative_insn around for the moment > > (3) Once the dust has settled for 4.3, we can see how easy the old > macro is to remove > > Sound ok to you? Absolutely fine. I will get the split out patches posted soon. Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternative: Provide if/else/endif assembler macros Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-07-16 20:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternative: Provide if/else/endif assembler macros Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> - 2015-07-17 12:50 +0200
csiph-web