Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1186653
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree |
| Date | 2015-07-17 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pNarg-1FW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pMYJs-1Go-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pN6dY-4dF-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:11:19PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > I wonder why? Isn't the owner needed for module_get/module_put or am I > missing something? The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it statically so we get all this code churn. I'm not sure I understand the win TBH.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-16 23:20 +0200
Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-07-17 07:20 +0200
Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-17 11:50 +0200
Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-07-17 12:00 +0200
Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-07-17 14:00 +0200
csiph-web