Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1183957
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] lightweight per-cpu locks / restartable sequences |
| Date | 2015-07-14 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pMeGC-2db-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKoTL-3En-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKpwt-48D-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKKhA-pQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLIGL-3rw-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLMAG-612-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> Now the 'problem' is finding these special regions fast, the easy >> solution is the same as the one proposed for userspace, one big section. >> That way the interrupt only has to check if the IP is inside this >> section which is minimal effort. >> >> The down side is that all percpu ops would then end up being full >> function calls. Which on some archs is indeed faster than disabling >> interrupts, but not by much I'm afraid. > > Well one could move the entire functions that are using these ops into the > special sections. That is certainly an area requiring much more thought. Hmm. > >> > optimize the x86 variants if interrupts also can detect critical sections >> > and restart at defined points. >> >> I really don't see how we can beat %GS prefixes with any such scheme. > > We may be able to avoid RMV sequences which allows the processor to better > schedule operations. True, but cmpxchg is, surprisingly, pretty fast. Crazy thought: At the risk of proposing something ridiculous, what if we had per-cpu memory mappings? We could do this at the cost of up to 2kB of memcpy whenever we switch mms. Expensive but maybe not a showstopper. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] lightweight per-cpu locks / restartable sequences Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-07-10 19:30 +0200
Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] lightweight per-cpu locks / restartable sequences Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-13 12:00 +0200
Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] lightweight per-cpu locks / restartable sequences Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-07-14 22:10 +0200
csiph-web