Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1182152
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] nohz: prevent tilegx network driver interrupts |
| Date | 2015-07-11 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pL46C-4hQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKKrf-t8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKLdD-Z0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKLQm-1rE-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:05:02PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 07/10/2015 02:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >Indeed we are doing more and more references on housekeeping_mask, so > >we should probably think about an off-case. > > > >Now the nohz-full off-case should rather be cpu_possible_mask than > >cpu_online_mask. housekeeping_mask doesn't take into account onlining > >at all. > > That suggests that in this case, we might want to default to > something like "housekeeping_mask & cpu_online_mask", > since you really don't want to send irqs to offline cores to > process your packets :-) In any case it must be up to the drivers to do that. Define housekeeping_mask as a subset of the online mask complicates a lot of things. It pushes hotplug complexity to the nohz code for no reasons. It's up to the drivers and subsystems to handle that really. > > The tilegx chips typically don't do cpu offlining anyway, since > we've never really found a usecase, so whatever you boot with > you always have available. We do have support for a bare-metal > mode which you can run on some of the cores, so you may start > with fewer than cpu_possible actually running, but it will always > be that same set of cores. And that bare metal mode runs out of Linux? Note that in nohz_full, The boot CPU can't be offline anyway. > > So this does suggest that my original patch is wrong for that > same reason. > > >>2. Provide an accessor that returns the cpumask to use for housekeeping > >> chores and implement it in the obvious ways for both nohz_full > >> and non-nohz_full. > >> > >>The latter seems like arguably the most satisfying approach, but > >>the patch below is, if nothing else, suitable to push for 4.3 > >>without any further API development work. > >I don't know. 1) looks easier. > > On reflection, the problem with (1) is that if you are in NO_HZ_FULL > mode but !tick_nohz_full_enabled(), you want to fall back to just > using cpu_possible_mask anyway. So I think a simple accessor that > returns an appropriate cpumask pointer is probably the best bet > (along the lines of the existing is_housekeeping_cpu() accessor). Ok! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] nohz: prevent tilegx network driver interrupts Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> - 2015-07-10 19:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH] nohz: prevent tilegx network driver interrupts Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 16:40 +0200
csiph-web