Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper

From	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper
Date	2015-07-10 20:00 +0200
Message-ID	<pKKKD-A5-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <pKoqJ-3ul-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKsNI-6ae-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKGQG-6Gh-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKHtp-791-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKK7U-mu-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> No it's not much configurable. The works are scheduled on tasks that are
> node affine and you can't change that for system_unbound_wq. Only WQ_SYSFS
> workqueues can be overriden on their no_numa property but even there that's
> after the boot and most of the usermodehelper load goes on boot.

Well then lets have at least one thread per NUMA node so that NUMA
affinity works?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 19:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-07-10 20:00 +0200

csiph-web