Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1181777
| From | Guenter <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait |
| Date | 2015-07-10 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pKK7V-mu-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKJOy-8s9-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:57:28PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The current _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait function does not sleep while testing
> the stats busy bit. Fix this by using the generic _mv88e6xxx_wait
> function.
>
> Note that it requires to move _mv88e6xxx_wait on top of
> _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait to avoid undefined reference compilation error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> index f6c7409..7753db1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> @@ -557,19 +557,31 @@ static bool mv88e6xxx_6352_family(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> return false;
> }
>
> +/* Must be called with SMI lock held */
> +static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
> + u16 mask)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
> +
> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, reg, offset);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (!(ret & mask))
> + return 0;
> +
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + }
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> /* Must be called with SMI mutex held */
> static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> {
> - int ret;
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATS_OP);
> - if ((ret & GLOBAL_STATS_OP_BUSY) == 0)
> - return 0;
> - }
Hi Vivien,
is this really beneficial and/or needed ? It adds at least 1ms delay
to a loop which did not have any delay at all unless the register
read itself was sleeping. Is the original function seen to return
a timeout error under some circumstances ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-07-10 19:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait Guenter <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-07-10 19:20 +0200
csiph-web