Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1181722
| From | Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: reset: at91: add sama5d3 reset function |
| Date | 2015-07-10 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pKJbQ-8ea-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKh5U-7lB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKzFw-2aA-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKBnZ-34H-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKFhW-5PP-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKFKW-61e-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | atmel |
Le 10/07/2015 14:31, Maxime Ripard a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:09:07PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/07/2015 at 15:56:52 +0800, Josh Wu wrote : >>> I would agree with Maxime. Currently all latest chip reset function is >>> compatible with the atmel,sama5d3-rstc. >>> So check compatible string is enough for now. >>> But of cause if we have other incompatible reset in future with new chip, >>> the structure like you said is needed. >> >> We managed to avoid using of_machine_is_compatible() in all the at91 >> drivers. I'd like to keep it that way. It was painful enough to remove >> all those cpu_is_at91xxx calls. > > That's your call... > >> Also, using it is trying to match strings and will result in longer boot >> times. > > Have you looked at the implementation of of_match_device? If that's > really a concern to you, you should actually avoid it. I agree: let's keep it simple and use of_match_device(). Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: reset: at91: add sama5d3 reset function Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-07-10 18:20 +0200
csiph-web