Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1180320

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem

From Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem
Date 2015-07-09 02:00 +0200
Message-ID <pK7pU-1br-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <pK1aO-5wA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK4V4-88w-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK60O-oY-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK6au-ti-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK6Nc-Ym-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:16:12PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:33:25PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > The basic issue is that cdev_del doesn't seem to be synchronizing.
> > > 
> > > The use after free race is then something like:
> > > 
> > >    struct tpm_chip {
> > >  	struct device dev;
> > > 	struct cdev cdev;
> > 
> > Oops, right there's your problem.  You can't have two reference counted
> > objects trying to manage the memory of a single structure.  No matter
> > what you do, it's going to be a pain to deal with this, so don't :)
> 
> Sure, generally, yes, but that isn't done for no reason, it is to make
> open straightforward:
> 
> static int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> 	struct tpm_chip *chip =
> 		container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct tpm_chip, cdev);
> 
> We need to recover the tpm_chip associated with the char device
> node, in a way that is holding a kref on it, without racing with
> cdev_del/etc
> 
> This scheme does mean that if we have a struct file we have a kref on
> the cdev, and if we have cdev then we have a kref on the tpm_chip,
> which is really easy to use properly.
> 
> > > Ie we need cdev to hold a ref on tpm_chip->dev until cdev_put is
> > > called.
> > 
> > No, separate them, make the cdev a pointer and all should be fine.
> 
> Okay, cdev_alloc takes care of the cdev lifetime.
> 
> Do you have a simple solution to replace container_of as well?
> 
> What would you think about something like:
> 
>  cdev_alloc(&chip->dev.kref)

Just pick either the cdev to handle the lifetime rules, or the struct
device, you'll still need a container_of().  Just don't do both as odds
are the lifetime rules is going to get really hard to debug and ensure
that everything is correct on the shutdown/release path.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2015-07-09 01:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-07-09 02:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 02:50 +0200

csiph-web