Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1178739
| From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PULL] virtio/vhost: cross endian support |
| Date | 2015-07-07 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pJEnU-85A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pHvyp-Fn-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pHFR7-7su-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pHIP1-Na-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pHJ8m-U3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pJE4A-7Yw-83@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:32:52 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:12:56AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:01:28 +0200 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > ... > > > > Yea, well - support for legacy BE guests on the new LE hosts is > > > > exactly the motivation for this. > > > > > > > > I dislike it too, but there are two redeeming properties that > > > > made me merge this: > > > > > > > > 1. It's a trivial amount of code: since we wrap host/guest accesses > > > > anyway, almost all of it is well hidden from drivers. > > > > > > > > 2. Sane platforms would never set flags like VHOST_CROSS_ENDIAN_LEGACY - > > > > and when it's clear, there's zero overhead (as some point it was > > > > tested by compiling with and without the patches, got the same > > > > stripped binary). > > > > > > > > Maybe we could create a Kconfig symbol to enforce point (2): prevent > > > > people from enabling it e.g. on x86. I will look into this - but it can > > > > be done by a patch on top, so I think this can be merged as is. > > > > > > > > > > This cross-endian *oddity* is targeting PowerPC book3s_64 processors... I > > > am not aware of any other users. Maybe create a symbol that would > > > be only selected by PPC_BOOK3S_64 ? > > > > I think some ARM systems are trying to support cross-endian > > configurations as well. > > > > Besides that, yes, this is more or less what I had in mind. > > Would something simple like this already do the job: > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig > --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config VHOST > > config VHOST_CROSS_ENDIAN_LEGACY > bool "Cross-endian support for vhost" > + depends on KVM_BOOK3S_64 || KVM_ARM_HOST > default n > ---help--- > This option allows vhost to support guests with a different byte > > ? Do all ARM hosts support this dynamic endian-ness? > If that looks acceptable, I can submit a proper patch if you like. > > Thomas I think I prefer some kind of symbol defined by these arches, so I don't get to maintain an arch list in vhost. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PULL] virtio/vhost: cross endian support Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-07-02 11:20 +0200
Re: [PULL] virtio/vhost: cross endian support "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-07-02 11:40 +0200
Re: [PULL] virtio/vhost: cross endian support Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> - 2015-07-07 18:40 +0200
Re: [PULL] virtio/vhost: cross endian support "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-07-07 19:00 +0200
csiph-web