Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1176654
| From | Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PM / Runtime: Add pm_runtime_enable_recursive |
| Date | 2015-07-03 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pIaUW-1GA-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pIa8x-1as-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Yeah, that would remove the need for messing with the runtime PM > >> enable status of descendant devices, but I wonder why Rafael went that > >> way initially. > > > > I forget the details. Probably it was just to be safe. We probably > > thought that if a device was disabled for runtime PM then its runtime > > PM status might not be accurate. But if direct_complete is set then it > > may be reasonable to assume that the runtime PM status _is_ accurate. > > Cool. > > Rafael and I briefly discussed ignore_children while the original > > direct_complete patch was being designed. We didn't come to any > > definite conclusion and decided to forget about it for the time being. > > Maybe now would be a good time to reconsider it. > > I would prefer to have ignore_children ignore whether the children of > a device were able to do direct_complete, rather than having a > direct_complete_default flag (plus not requiring that all its > descendants have runtime PM enabled). Okay, but remember that sometimes these "virtual" devices will exist beneath a device that needs to have ignore_children off. So this won't be a complete solution to your problem. Let's see what Rafael thinks about these two issues. It seems to me that the hardest part is dealing with drivers/subsystems that have no runtime PM support. In such cases, we have to be very careful not to use direct_complete unless we know that the device does no power management at all. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PM / Runtime: Add pm_runtime_enable_recursive Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-07-03 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PM / Runtime: Add pm_runtime_enable_recursive Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2015-07-03 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PM / Runtime: Add pm_runtime_enable_recursive Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-07-03 17:20 +0200
csiph-web