Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1176595
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" |
| Date | 2015-07-03 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pI9YS-17f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pHZd7-2Kt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pI6Rk-7tK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pI9cu-AJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pI9ma-E1-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > So with high res timers it boots. Can you please provide the output of > > /proc/timer_list for that case? > Tick Device: mode: 1 > Per CPU device: 0 > Clock Event Device: e0180000.timer > max_delta_ns: 131071523464982 > min_delta_ns: 61035 > mult: 70369 > shift: 31 > mode: 3 > next_event: 40760000000 nsecs > set_next_event: em_sti_clock_event_next > set_mode: em_sti_clock_event_mode > event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt > retries: 0 So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as broadcast device. Though the issues you see in the highres=n case might be the same as the ones Simon is observing. So in that nohz=y highres=n case, does adding idle=poll on the command line fix the issue? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> - 2015-07-03 04:50 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 13:00 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-07-03 13:10 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 15:30 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 15:40 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 16:20 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 16:40 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-07-03 16:50 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-07-03 17:00 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 17:00 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 17:00 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 17:20 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 17:30 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 17:50 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-07-03 18:00 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-07-03 18:10 +0200
Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-07-03 19:10 +0200
csiph-web