Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1171761
| From | Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFCv2][PATCH 3/7] fs: fsnotify: replace memory barrier in __sb_end_write() with RCU |
| Date | 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pF33A-on-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pF33z-on-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
If I sit in a loop and do write()s to small tmpfs files,
__sb_end_write() is third-hottest kernel function due to its
smp_mb().
__sb_end_write() uses the barrier to avoid races with freeze_super()
and its calls to sb_wait_write(). But, now that freeze_super() is
calling synchronize_rcu() before each sb_wait_write() call, we can
use that to our advantage.
The synchronize_rcu() ensures that all __sb_end_write() will see
freeze_super()'s updates to s_writers.counter. That, in turn,
guarantees that __sb_end_write() will try to wake up any subsequent
call by freeze_super() to sb_wait_write().
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
b/fs/super.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/super.c~selectively-do-barriers-in-__sb_end_write fs/super.c
--- a/fs/super.c~selectively-do-barriers-in-__sb_end_write 2015-06-24 17:14:35.315142611 -0700
+++ b/fs/super.c 2015-06-24 17:14:35.318142745 -0700
@@ -1146,14 +1146,23 @@ out:
*/
void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
{
+ rcu_read_lock();
percpu_counter_dec(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
/*
- * Make sure s_writers are updated before we wake up waiters in
- * freeze_super().
+ * We are racing here with freeze_super()'s calls to
+ * sb_wait_write(). We want to ensure that we call
+ * wake_up() whenever one of those calls _might_ be
+ * in sb_wait_write().
+ *
+ * Since freeze_super() does a synchronize_rcu() before
+ * each of its sb_wait_write() calls, it can guarantee
+ * that it sees our update to s_writers.counter as well
+ * as that we see its update to s_writers.frozen.
*/
- smp_mb();
- if (waitqueue_active(&sb->s_writers.wait))
+ if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level))
wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _RET_IP_);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write);
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFCv2][PATCH 1/7] fs: optimize inotify/fsnotify code for unwatched files Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 2/7] fs: use RCU for free_super() vs. __sb_start_write() Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 3/7] fs: fsnotify: replace memory barrier in __sb_end_write() with RCU Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 4/7] fsnotify: encapsulate embedded fsnotify data in a single spot Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 5/7] fsnotify: use fsnotify_head for vfsmount data Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 7/7] fsnotify: track when ignored mask clearing is needed Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 [RFCv2][PATCH 6/7] fsnotify: change fsnotify_recalc_mask() conventions Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200 Re: [RFCv2][PATCH 1/7] fs: optimize inotify/fsnotify code for unwatched files Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> - 2015-06-25 03:00 +0200
csiph-web