Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1169514
| From | Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] futex: lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up |
| Date | 2015-06-21 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pDFd0-2YG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <pC4Iy-3oZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pC5bA-40P-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCh34-4u4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCmm6-3M8-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCmvL-3Xc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 16:28 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 06/17/2015 04:17 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 10:33 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> wake_futex_pi() wakes the task before releasing the hash bucket lock > >> (HB). The first thing the woken up task usually does is to acquire the > >> lock which requires the HB lock. On SMP Systems this leads to blocking > >> on the HB lock which is released by the owner shortly after. > >> This patch rearranges the unlock path by first releasing the HB lock and > >> then waking up the task. > >> > >> [bigeasy: redo ontop of lockless wake-queues] > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> > > > > 4.1-rc8-rt4 contains this via 4.0-rt4, and seems fine on my 64 core > > DL980. I ran a few iterations of futextests and stockfish, then mixed > > two loops of futextest at different rt prios, with stockfish also rt, > > and ltplight as tossed in as... crack filler. Box is still doing that, > > is way too busy, but not griping about it. > > There are two patches mostly doing the same thing. The patch posted > here is a redo ontop of "lockless wake-queues". It does hb-unlock, > wakeup, de-boost. The patch merged into -RT is the original approach > not using "lockless wake-queues" and performing wakeup, hb-unlock, > de-boost. > > I plan to get into -RT the final solution once it hits upstream. I plugged patch1 and tip version into rt and beat it, seems solid. Converting the rest of rtmutex.c to use wake queues with ->save_state to select wake function went less well. Kernel does a good impersonation of a working kernel until I beat it up, then it loses wakeups. Hohum, so much for yet another early morning tinker session. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] futex: lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2015-06-16 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-06-16 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] futex: lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 06:40 +0200
csiph-web