Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1167642
| From | fandongdong <fandd@inspur.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Panic when cpu hot-remove |
| Date | 2015-06-18 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pCCTU-28V-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pCj4R-7np-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCkaD-tn-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCmFs-48q-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCAS6-7Kt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pCCTU-28V-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
在 2015/6/18 15:27, fandongdong 写道:
>
>
> 在 2015/6/18 13:40, Jiang Liu 写道:
>> On 2015/6/17 22:36, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:52 +0200, Joerg Roedeljoro wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:42:49AM +0000, 范冬冬 wrote:
>>>>> Hi maintainer,
>>>>>
>>>>> We found a problem that a panic happen when cpu was hot-removed.
>>>>> We also trace the problem according to the calltrace information.
>>>>> An endless loop happen because value head is not equal to value
>>>>> tail forever in the function qi_check_fault( ).
>>>>> The location code is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> do {
>>>>> if (qi->desc_status[head] == QI_IN_USE)
>>>>> qi->desc_status[head] = QI_ABORT;
>>>>> head = (head - 2 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
>>>>> } while (head != tail);
>>>> Hmm, this code interates only over every second QI descriptor, and
>>>> tail
>>>> probably points to a descriptor that is not iterated over.
>>>>
>>>> Jiang, can you please have a look?
>>> I think that part is normal, the way we use the queue is to always
>>> submit a work operation followed by a wait operation so that we can
>>> determine the work operation is complete. That's done via
>>> qi_submit_sync(). We have had spurious reports of the queue getting
>>> impossibly out of sync though. I saw one that was somehow linked to
>>> the
>>> I/O AT DMA engine. Roland Dreier saw something similar[1]. I'm not
>>> sure if they're related to this, but maybe worth comparing. Thanks,
>> Thanks, Alex and Joerg!
>>
>> Hi Dongdong,
>> Could you please help to give some instructions about how to
>> reproduce this issue? I will try to reproduce it if possible.
>> Thanks!
>> Gerry
> Hi Gerry,
>
> We're running kernel 4.1.0 on a 4-socket system and we want to
> offline socket 1.
> Steps as follows:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0004:01/eject
>
> Thanks!
> Dongdong
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2015-January/011502.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>> .
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Panic when cpu hot-remove Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-06-18 07:50 +0200 Re: Panic when cpu hot-remove fandongdong <fandd@inspur.com> - 2015-06-18 10:00 +0200
csiph-web