Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1166278

Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt

From Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt
Date 2015-06-16 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <pC2Qr-GT-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <pBNHI-3WS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBODL-5mO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBRUZ-1yj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBYa7-2jk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBYjN-2uo-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/16/15 5:38 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> static int free_thread(void *arg)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct htab_elem *l;
> +
> +	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&elem_freelist_lock, flags);
> +		while (!list_empty(&elem_freelist)) {
> +			l = list_entry(elem_freelist.next,
> +				struct htab_elem, list);
> +			list_del(&l->list);
> +			kfree(l);

that's not right, since such thread defeats rcu protection of lookup.
We need either kfree_rcu/call_rcu or synchronize_rcu.
Obviously the former is preferred that's why I'm still digging into it.
Probably a thread that does kfree_rcu would be ok, but we shouldn't
be doing it unconditionally. For all networking programs and 99%
of tracing programs the existing code is fine and I don't want to
slow it down to tackle the corner case.
Extra spin_lock just to add it to the list is also quite costly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-06-16 03:20 +0200
  Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-06-16 19:30 +0200
    Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-06-16 19:40 +0200
    Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-17 22:40 +0200
      Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-06-17 23:00 +0200
        Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-17 23:40 +0200
          Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-06-18 02:00 +0200
            Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-18 02:30 +0200
  Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-16 19:50 +0200
    Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-06-16 21:00 +0200
      Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-16 21:30 +0200
        Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-06-16 21:30 +0200
          Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-06-16 21:40 +0200

csiph-web