Re: lockup when C1E and high-resolution timers enabled

From	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: lockup when C1E and high-resolution timers enabled
Date	2015-06-15 10:00 +0200
Message-ID	<pBxtf-5wq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pB6CJ-7YZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pB81P-1v6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBjgB-1Ef-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBpcn-2dG-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:05:07AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > > already using latest microcode:
> > > 
> > > [    0.514490] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514497] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514508] microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514519] microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514529] microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514540] microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514550] microcode: CPU6: patch_level=0x06000822
> > > [    0.514561] microcode: CPU7: patch_level=0x06000822
> > 
> > This is not the latest microcode.
> 
> > so what changed?
> 
> nice catch, my bad -- forgot to post all microcode messages.
> 
> $ dmesg | grep microcode:
> [    0.514422] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514429] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514440] microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514450] microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514460] microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514493] microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514502] microcode: CPU6: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514513] microcode: CPU7: patch_level=0x06000822
> [    0.514557] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
> [    3.909642] microcode: CPU0: new patch_level=0x06000832
> [    3.940694] microcode: CPU2: new patch_level=0x06000832
> [    3.955187] microcode: CPU4: new patch_level=0x06000832
> [    3.963403] microcode: CPU6: new patch_level=0x06000832

Just to rule out the aspect that your issue might be fixed by microcode
but that microcode needs to be loaded early, can you enable the early
microcode loader, put the microcode in initrd as described here:

Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt

and retry?

I'm working on having it built-in too, in the case where people don't
use initrd, but that's 64-bit only for now.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: lockup when C1E and high-resolution timers enabled Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-06-15 10:00 +0200
  Re: lockup when C1E and high-resolution timers enabled Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com> - 2015-06-15 10:10 +0200
    Re: lockup when C1E and high-resolution timers enabled Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-06-15 10:20 +0200

csiph-web