Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1165042

Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: make optimistic check for swapin readahead

From Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: make optimistic check for swapin readahead
Date 2015-06-15 08:40 +0200
Message-ID <pBwdP-3OT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pBhHQ-7Y8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBhHR-7Y8-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBvrs-2G5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBvrs-2G5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBvKN-3hf-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/15/2015 02:08 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/15/2015 01:40 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Ebru Akagunduz
>>> <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This patch makes optimistic check for swapin readahead
>>>> to increase thp collapse rate. Before getting swapped
>>>> out pages to memory, checks them and allows up to a
>>>> certain number. It also prints out using tracepoints
>>>> amount of unmapped ptes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>
>>
>>>> @@ -2639,11 +2640,11 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>>  {
>>>>         pmd_t *pmd;
>>>>         pte_t *pte, *_pte;
>>>> -       int ret = 0, none_or_zero = 0;
>>>> +       int ret = 0, none_or_zero = 0, unmapped = 0;
>>>>         struct page *page;
>>>>         unsigned long _address;
>>>>         spinlock_t *ptl;
>>>> -       int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>>> +       int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, max_ptes_swap = HPAGE_PMD_NR/8;
>>> Sorry for asking, my knoweldge of THP is very limited, but why did you
>>> choose this default value?
>>> From the discussion followed by your patch
>>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/27/432), I got an impression that it is
>>> not necessary right value.
>>
>> I believe that Ebru's main focus for this initial version of
>> the patch series was to get the _mechanism_ (patch 3) right,
>> while having a fairly simple policy to drive it.
>>
>> Any suggestions on when it is a good idea to bring in pages
>> from swap, and whether to treat resident-in-swap-cache pages
>> differently from need-to-be-paged-in pages, and what other
>> factors should be examined, are very welcome...
> My concern with these patches that they deal with specific
> load/scenario (most of the application returned back from swap). In
> scenario there only 10% of data will be required, it theoretically can
> bring upto 80% data (70% waste).

The chosen threshold ensures that the remaining non-resident
4kB pages in a THP are only brought in if 7/8th (or 87.5%) of
the pages are already resident.

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: make optimistic check for swapin readahead Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-06-15 07:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: make optimistic check for swapin readahead Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu> - 2015-06-15 08:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: make optimistic check for swapin readahead Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-06-15 08:40 +0200

csiph-web